Archives

2 A B C D E F G H I K L M N O P R S T U V W

wavenumber

number of wavelengths per cm

[table caption=”sample wavenumbers” width=”300″ colwidth=”100|100|100″ colalign=”left|left|left”]
wavenumber (cm^-1),wavelength (um),frequency (THz)
22727,0.440,682
18181,0.550,545
15152,0.660,455
11765,850,353
10000,1,300
1000,10,30
[/table]

wide angle lens

Entocentric lens with a focal length smaller than the sensor diagonal, eg an f = 6mm lens on a 1/2″ sensor (the sensor size has 8mm).

When we use the word “wide angle lens”, it must be clear what sensor is used.

The same lens can, depending on the sensor, be wide-angle, telephoto lens and normal lens.

A lens of f = 8mm on a 1/3 “sensor (6mm diagonal) a slight telephoto lens.
On a 1/2 “Sensor (8mm diagonal) it is a normal lens and on a 2/3” sensor (with 11mm diagonal) a wide-angle lens.

see discussion under normal lens

working F-number

When you insert distance rings between camera and lens you might have noticed that the image gets darker and the field of view gets smaller.
As the lens was not changed, the F-number of the lens still must be the same. The darker image and the reduced field of view are described by the working F-number, also called effective F-number.

The F-number F\# is only defined for objects at infinite distance.
The sensor has according the definition of the focal length exactly the distance “focal loength” from the principal plane when the lens is focussed to infinity.

When an object comes closer, it’s image moves in the same direction. It moves further away from the principal plane.

To keep the object focussed, the distance of lens and sensor must be increased. This is equivalent with adding distance rings reagrding the infinity position of the lens. As result the images gets darker the field of view gets smaller , the therefore the magnification |M| changes.

It holds:

{F_{w}\approx {1 \over 2\mathrm {NA} _{i}}\approx \left(1+{\frac {|M|}{P}}\right)F\#}

where
F_{w} working F-number or effective F-number.
{NA} _{i} image side numerical apertur,
|M| the magnification for this focus distance and
P is the pupil magnification.

For symmetrical lenses die pupil magnification is equal to 1 and the formula simplifies to

{F_{w}\approx {1 \over 2\mathrm {NA} _{i}}\approx \left(1+{|M|}\right)F\#}

Especially:

For an objective used for a 1:1 mapping holds:

{F_{w}\approx {1 \over 2\mathrm {NA} _{i}}\approx \left(1+{|1|}\right)F\#} =  2\mathrm F\#

The effective F-number can also be described by the height “delta” of the inserted distance rings:

F_{w} = \frac {f + delta }{\frac {f}{F\#}}
because

(1) F\# = \frac {f}{EPD} and

(2) F_{w} = \frac {f + delta }{EPD}

From (1) we get

EPD = \frac {f}{F\#}

with this we get from (2) :

F_{w} = \frac {f + delta }{\frac {f}{F\#}}

From this we can derive a third way to calculate the working F# :

F_{w} =  (1 + Magnification) F\#
From above we learnt
F_{w} = \frac {f + delta }{\frac {f}{F\#}}

With the length of the needed distance rings delta
delta = Magnification * Focal length = M * f

we get

F_{w} = \frac {f + f*M }{\frac {f}{F\#}} = \frac {f(1 + M}{\frac {f}{F\#}}

or shorter

F_{w} = {F\#}*(1 + M)
q.e.d.

For a lens of Working F# F_{w} = 12.5 and Magnification 1.5 holds
F_{w} = {F\#}*(1 + M) =  {F\#}*(1 + 1.5)
and therefore
{F\#} = 12.5 / 2.5 = 5

see also:
F-Number
Pupil magnification
Numerical Aperture